<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://nonsitecollective.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>d</title>
 <link>http://nonsitecollective.org/taxonomy/term/90</link>
 <description>The taxonomy view with a depth of 0.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>the pursuit/persistence of risk, post-potluck aporia</title>
 <link>http://nonsitecollective.org/node/468</link>
 <description>I am entering this discussion within the fibers of personal and professional desire/response/ community discourse.

On one hand, it delights me to know that notes for this discussion on disability/disablement were made during the Movement Research Festival Potluck, though also find admitted irony in the fact that I could not attend it due to my own chronic pain (as disability or from a physical disfiguration that is the disability, who can define which?). 

Something that has been a little hard for me to enter in this blog is the technical apparatus of &quot;disability&quot; and its various functions...

I prefer more to find agency in a discussion of the mechanism of suffering, which is a very personal and continuous ____ for one who is disabled. 

This ____ is my gift to you, reader to insert whatever word you think fits best. 

I think of &quot;place,&quot; &quot;ground,&quot; &quot;text,&quot; &quot;momentum,&quot; &quot;test,&quot; &quot;dance,&quot; &quot;funk,&quot; or &quot;motherfucker.&quot; For me that is more interesting than this idea of re-invention that we seem to be fantastically splashing around in through this discourse. 

I am not saying that it is beside the point to re-work this term, or to create perspectives or situations where this sense of the abled and disabled border is dismantled.

I think that the previous bloggers have done an excellent job of that on the nonsite, 

but I AM saying that pain is pain, 

discomfort is important information, and that can&#039;t be by-passed by a revision of terminology or code.

The most important art that I have witnessed or been a part of has emerged from or addressed 

the artist&#039;s struggle to overcome suffering, 

whether it is rooted in disfigurement, 
addiction, 
loss of many kinds, 
and the awkward place 
where a desire cannot be met 
but persists in its strength of presence, 
like the struggle for identity whether that is maintaining one or uncovering one. 
</description>
 <comments>http://nonsitecollective.org/node/468#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://nonsitecollective.org/taxonomy/term/90">d</category>
 <category domain="http://nonsitecollective.org/taxonomy/term/91">disablement discussion</category>
 <category domain="http://nonsitecollective.org/taxonomy/term/87">discussion</category>
 <category domain="http://nonsitecollective.org/taxonomy/term/78">discussions</category>
 <category domain="http://nonsitecollective.org/taxonomy/term/86">Poetics of Disablement</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 03:11:10 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>M. Perel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">468 at http://nonsitecollective.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
